Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 DECEMBER 2017

Spotlight On Upcoming Oral Arguments – October 2017

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The Federal Circuit hits the road this week, hearing oral arguments in New York City, including at the Court of International Trade, NYU Law School, and Columbia Law School.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Federal Circuit hits the road this week, hearing oral arguments in New York City, including at the Court of International Trade, NYU Law School, and Columbia Law School.

Monday, October 2, 2017

Xitronix Corp. v. KLA-Tencor Corp., No. 16-2746, Courtroom 203

This appeal arises from a Western District of Texas summary judgment order finding that KLA did not engage in fraud in its prosecution and procurement of the patent-in-suit. KLA argues that the court correctly found that it disclosed all prior art and related materials to the PTO and thus did not misrepresent or omit any material facts, fulfilling its duty of candor to the PTO.  Xitronix argues that the Examiner relied upon KLA's misrepresentation of the relevant prior art and that the mere disclosure of the judgment invalidating a nearly identical patent was not sufficient to satisfy the duty of candor. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from