Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MARCH 2014

Sometimes It Pays Less When You Argue More

Not every hour spent on successful motion practice is treated equally in determining appropriate Rule 37 sanctions, according to Judge Hamilton’s March 14, 2014 Order awarding partial attorney fees.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Perfect Surgical Techniques, Inc. v. Olympus America, Inc. et al., Case No. 12-5967 (Judge Hamilton)

Not every hour spent on successful motion practice is treated equally (or at all) in determining appropriate Rule 37 sanctions, according to Judge Hamilton's March 14, 2014 Order awarding partial attorney fees. Even though Judge Hamilton seems to agree that patent litigation is a specialized practice that may justify higher rates, she nevertheless awarded Defendants in this case 25% of their claimed fees after successful efforts to strike infringement contentions.

Defendants moved to strike as insufficient Perfect Surgical's first amended Patent Local Rule 3-1 infringement contentions, which were based largely on user manuals. The Court ordered Plaintiff to supplement its contentions after "evaluat[ing] up close each of the accused devices." But Perfect Surgical purchased only one of four accused products, and Defendants again moved to strike the supplemented

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from