Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2020

So Long, And Thanks For All The Fish

Appeals to both the Board and the Federal Circuit were cast by a pro se applicant, who is also a patent attorney.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a recent precedential decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision, upholding an examiner's final rejection of claims to a fishing method as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101. In re Rudy, Case 2019-2301, Slip Op. (Fed. Cir. Apr. 24, 2020). Appeals to both the Board and the Federal Circuit were cast by a pro se applicant, who is also a patent attorney.

The application, originally filed in 1989, includes a prosecution history that is stuffed to the gills, including multiple visits to the Board and a prior Federal Circuit appeal where the court affirmed a Board conclusion that then-pending claims were obvious. In re Rudy, 558 F. App'x. 1011 (Fed. Cir. 2014).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from