Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JUNE 2016

Signer With Remorse Seeks To Avoid ‘Unrestricted' Photography Release

Elodie Passelaigue made various legal claims against Getty Images over its licensure of an image of her for Botox ads.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Can an "unrestricted" release be restricted?

That is one issue raised in connection with a model's suit against Getty Images. Elodie Passelaigue made various legal claims against Getty Images over its licensure of an image of her for Botox ads. 

Getty, in a motion to dismiss, cited the broad release that Ms. Passelaigue signed after a professional photographer shot photos of her in a test for Clinique. The one-page, two-paragraph model release granted the photographer "the unrestricted right to use [her] appearance, form, likeness and voice, ... contained in the photographs" and to distribute the images "for editorial, trade, advertising, packaging, or other purposes in any manner or medium ... throughout the world, in perpetuity." 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from