Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MARCH 2020

Settlement Agreement Moots An Action, Even If It Requires Future Performance

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The district court granted a party's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement—after the parties had entered into a settlement agreement.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The district court granted a party's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement—after the parties had entered into a settlement agreement.  The Federal Circuit vacated and remanded in Serta Simmons Bedding, LLC v. Casper Sleep Inc., Nos. 19-1098, 19-1159 (Feb. 13, 2020).

Serta alleged that Casper infringed its mattress patents.  Casper moved for summary judgment of noninfringement.  On June 18, 2018, with those motions still pending, the parties entered into a settlement agreement that, among other things, required Casper to stop manufacturing and marketing certain products by mid-July and pay a settlement amount by June 28, 2018.  Two days later, without mentioning the settlement, the court granted Casper's summary judgment motions.  Casper then refused to pay. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from