Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 NOVEMBER 2025

Section 101 Roundup: The USPTO, Congress And Realignment

The past two months have been active in the world of patent eligibility. There continues to be a craving for clarity, but what will that mean, if anything, at the courts?

United StatesIntellectual Property

The past two months have been active in the world of patent eligibility. There continues to be a craving for clarity, but what will that mean, if anything, at the courts?

Director Squires Sends a Message

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director John Squires used Ex parte Desjardins to make a point regarding a Google DeepMind artificial intelligence (AI) patent, holding that Section 101 was not the right place to challenge claim clarity, scope or inventiveness. Instead, those belong under Sections 102, 103 and 112:

However, it is with this view that the panel's sua sponte action is most troubling, as it eschewed the clear teachings of Enfish, and instead substituted only a cursory analysis that ignored this well-settled precedent. Panels should treat such precedent with more care, especially when acting sua sponte.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from