Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JULY 2026

Section 101: It Is Called Gardening – And Soccer Thoughts!

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California granted summary judgment under Section 101 in a patent case involving automated vineyard irrigation systems, finding the claims directed to the abstract idea...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Tell me, O Muse, of the man who sought to water his vines by sensor and signal, who wandered far through the federal courts after setting forth from the vineyards of California. (Sorry.)

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California recently granted summary judgment under Section 101 in Vineyard Investigations v. E. & J. Gallo Winery (E.D. Cal., July 2, 2026). Let's get into it.

The Background

Vineyard Investigations is a wine industry consulting company and owns three patents covering automated vineyard irrigation systems. The asserted patents cover systems that combine local sensor data with external data (weather, evapotranspiration coefficients) to control when water and chemicals get dispensed to grapevines. The defendant is E. & J. Gallo Winery.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from