Since the 1989 case of Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994
(2d Cir. 1989), courts have applied the Rogers test when
an artistic work is alleged to have infringed a Lanham
Act-protected right. With litigants locking horns over the
titles and other creative elements of their nature documentaries,
the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado proposed a
revision to the two-pronged Rogers test in the case of
Stouffer v. Nat’l Geographic Partners, LLC, No.
18-cv-3127-WJM-SKC, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140947 (D. Colo. Aug. 20,
2019).
Plaintiffs Marty Stouffer and his eponymous production company
produced and hosted a popular nature documentary series called
Wild America, which aired for decades on PBS.
Stouffer and National Geographic had discussed the possibility of
National Geographic licensing or purchasing some of his series, but
National Geographic ultimately declined. Stouffer then
declined to give National Geographic his permission to title an
upcoming natural