Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JANUARY 2023

Reissue Error Does Not Include Amending Claims To Overcome Patent Eligibility Rejection

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contributor
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt is a multidisciplinary, integrated national professional services firm known for quality and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

In In re McDonald, the Federal Circuit held that the recapture rule prevented reissue claims from including features deliberately relinquished in response to a patent eligibility rejection.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In In re McDonald,1 the Federal Circuit held that the recapture rule prevented reissue claims from including features deliberately relinquished in response to a patent eligibility rejection. As a result, the accompanying reissue declaration failed to identify errors correctable by reissue.

John Bradley McDonald filed a patent application in 2008 (2008 application) related to the display of primary and secondary search results for search queries. The 2008 application's initial claims 1-9 and 19-21 did not include a "processor" for performing the search queries. The Examiner refused the claims for reciting patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

Mr. McDonald responded by adding a processor to the claims and asserting that the addition of a processor provided meaningful restrictions on the scope of claims 1 and 19 by specifying a particular machine. The Examiner was persuaded and rescinded the Section 101 rejection. The 2008 patent application

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from