Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2015

PTAB Warns Patent Owner That Not Participating Will Result In Adverse Judgment

Accusing petitioner Shire Development of egregiously misrepresenting the prior art in its petition, patent owner LCS Group informed the Board of its intention not to further participate in the IPR.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Shire Dev. LLC v. LCS Group, LLC

Faced for the first time with a patent owner unwilling to participate in an inter partes review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) permitted the filing of a paper forgoing any further participation in the proceeding, warning that filing such a paper would result in an adverse judgment.  Shire Dev. LLC v. LCS Group, LLC, Case No. IPR2014-00739 (PTAB, Dec. 9, 2014) (Green, APJ).

Accusing petitioner Shire Development of egregiously misrepresenting the prior art in its petition, patent owner LCS Group informed the Board of its intention not to further participate in the IPR. The Board interpreted the statement as a motion for leave to file a "paper to that effect."  The Board granted the motion for leave, ordering that "if Patent Owner is planning on forgoing any further participation in this proceeding, it should file and is hereby permitted to file a paper to that effect."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from