Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MAY 2015

PTAB Issues Representative Decision On Scope Of Estoppel In IPR Proceedings

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the Board) at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office recently issued a decision interpreting the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(1) in inter partes review proceedings.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the Board) at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued a decision interpreting the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. §315(e)(1) in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings. See Dell Inc. v. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, IPR2015-00549 (PTAB, Paper 10, March 26, 2015).

The decision is one of only a handful of institution decisions that have been designated as "representative" by the Board. Under the Board's standard operating procedures, the "representative" designation is used to bring a decision to the attention of the public from among the numerous "routine" decisions issued by the Board.

In Dell, the petitioner sought inter partes review of claims 1-9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,978,346 (the '346 patent) on the ground that the claims would have been obvious over a combination of the Mylex and Hathorn references. The same petitioner had previously sought inter partes review of the same patent

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from