Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 APRIL 2018

Prima Facie Obviousness: Much Ado "Abut" Ranges

Addressing the issue of claims that recite a range that abuts but does not overlap that of a prior art reference, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB's) ...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Addressing the issue of claims that recite a range that abuts but does not overlap that of a prior art reference, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB's) finding of a prima facie case of obviousness. In Re: Brandt, Case No. 16-2601 (Fed. Cir., Mar. 27, 2018) (Reyna, J). 

The application in issue relates to "high density polyurethane or polyisocyanurate construction boards, as well as their use in flat or low-slope roofing systems." The independent claim recited as a feature "said coverboard having a density greater than 2.5 pounds per cubic foot and less than 6 pounds per cubic foot."

During examination, the examiner issued a final rejection under 35 USC § 103(a) over a prior art reference disclosing a prefabricated roofing panel with a coverboard having a polymer material core layer with a density "between 6 lbs/ft3 and 25 lbs/ft3 and preferably a density of at least 8 lbs/ft3." The examiner took the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from