Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MARCH 2019

Precedential No. 4: Finding Excusable Neglect Based On Attorney's Medical Issues, TTAB Re-Opens Petitioner's Testimony Period

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

In this brew-ha-ha over the mark COFFEE STUDIO, Respondent Reign LLC moved for dismissal after petitioner failed to submit any evidence or testimony during its testimony period.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In this brew-ha-ha over the mark COFFEE STUDIO, Respondent Reign LLC moved for dismissal after petitioner failed to submit any evidence or testimony during its testimony period. Petitioner Studio then moved (1) to strike Reign's dismissal motion due to improper service and (2) to re-open its testimony period on the ground that its evidentiary failure was excusable. The Board granted both of petitioner's motions. The Coffee Studio LLC v. Reign LLC dba Coffee Studio, Cancellation No. 92066245 (February 28, 2019) [precedential].

Improper Service Respondent Reign did not serve its motion for dismissal directly on Petitioner Studio, but instead relied on the email notice automatically generated by ESTTA that was sent to petitioner's counsel, with a link to the motion as it appears in TTABVUE. Reign argued that petitioner received actual notice of the motion via the Board's email, as evidenced by petitioner's filing a response to the motion.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from