In this brew-ha-ha over the mark COFFEE STUDIO,
Respondent Reign LLC moved for dismissal after petitioner failed to
submit any evidence or testimony during its testimony period.
Petitioner Studio then moved (1) to strike Reign's dismissal
motion due to improper service and (2) to re-open its testimony
period on the ground that its evidentiary failure was excusable.
The Board granted both of petitioner's motions. The Coffee Studio LLC v. Reign LLC dba
Coffee Studio, Cancellation No. 92066245
(February 28, 2019) [precedential].

Improper Service Respondent Reign did not serve
its motion for dismissal directly on Petitioner Studio, but instead
relied on the email notice automatically generated by ESTTA that
was sent to petitioner's counsel, with a link to the motion as
it appears in TTABVUE. Reign argued that petitioner received actual
notice of the motion via the Board's email, as evidenced by
petitioner's filing a response to the motion.