Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 FEBRUARY 2018

Precedential No. 3: TTAB Refuses To Limit Goods In Cited Software Registration, Affirms Section 2(D) Refusal

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark shown below left, for "Computer application software for mobile phones and desktop computers, namely...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark shown below left, for "Computer application software for mobile phones and desktop computers, namely, software for visualizing the popularity of places in real time, that uses an underlying map capability for navigation, sold as 'business to consumer' (B2C) software, and not as 'business to business' (B2B) software," finding it likely to cause confusion with the registered mark shown below right, for "Downloadable mobile applications for mobile phones and mobile electronic devices, primarily software for travel and destination marketing organizations and travel marketing professionals." Applicant Solid State argued, to no avail, that the registration improperly failed to specify the function of the software, but the Board observed that it lacked the power to read limitations into the unrestricted identification of goods in the registration. In re Solid State Design Inc., Serial No. 87269041 (January 3,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from