Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2023

Potential Implications Of US Copyright Office Determination On AI-Generated Work

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Partners Louis Tompros and Ariel Soiffer, Counsel Matthew F. Ferraro and Senior Associate Natalie Li penned an article for Tech Policy Press discussing the US Copyright Office's response...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Partners Louis Tompros and Ariel Soiffer, Counsel Matthew F. Ferraro and Senior Associate Natalie Li penned an article for Tech Policy Press discussing the US Copyright Office's response to the rapid increase in AI-generated work. The article delves into a recent ruling centered on the use of an AI art generator and a Copyright Office policy statement reiterating the need for human-involved creation in protectable works.

Excerpt: In the past several weeks, the U.S. Copyright Office issued both a copyright decision and a policy statement establishing important guidelines for how copyright applies to works created through the application of artificial intelligence (AI).

First, in its February 2023 decision regarding a graphic novel comprised in part of images generated by the AI art platform Midjourney, the Copyright Office reiterated the well-established standard that only works created by a human author, with at least a minimal degree of creativity, are

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from