Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2014

Patent Litigation Fee-Shifting

In April, the Supreme Court reshaped the patent litigation landscape with its Octane Fitness and Highmark rulings.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Supreme Court Opens the Door

In April, the Supreme Court reshaped the patent litigation landscape with its Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness and Highmark, Inc v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc., rulings. The statute at issue in both rulings was 35 U.S.C. § 285, which provides that a "court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party." The clear implication is that litigants in patent infringement litigation now have a greater opportunity to recover their attorneys' fees and expenses from adverse parties. These rulings serve as a warning to patent litigants to carefully consider their strategy before initiating continuing litigation under some circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from