Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 DECEMBER 2020

Orders Of Interest Roundup, Arthrex Style

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

At Federal Circuitry blog, we like to check in once in a while on what the Federal Circuit is doing in its orders that don't get posted on the public website.

United StatesIntellectual Property

At Federal Circuitry blog, we like to check in once in a while on what the Federal Circuit is doing in its orders that don't get posted on the public website. Those orders often offer nuggets about practice at the Federal Circuit and sometimes even give insight into more substantive issues. So below we flag a few orders that caught our eyes.

In looking at orders in the last month or so, we noticed a range of orders in pending cases following the Supreme Court's certiorari grant in Arthrex  (see Supreme Court to Review  Arthrex: Big Deal or Ho Hum? and What does the Supreme Court's Grant in Two Social Security Cases Have to Do with  Arthrex?). In some, the Federal Circuit declined to halt proceedings even though Arthrex's fate remains uncertain in the Supreme Court. For example, the Federal Circuit denied  an opposed stay request by an appellant from an inter partes  review in appeal No. 19-2151. The movant was a petitioner who argued for vacatur under the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from