Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JULY 2016

No Rehearing On Dual Use PTAB Panels

Judge Newman dissented, stating that the plain text of the AIA expressly divides IPR into two distinct phases, to be heard by two distinct entities.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Confirming that the same panel of judges at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) has the authority to institute America Invents Act (AIA) reviews and make a final determination on the merits, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied the patent owner’s petition to rehear the issue en banc. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien LP, Case No. 14-1771 (Fed. Cir., June 22, 2016) (Newman, J, dissenting).

Ethicon Endo-Surgery owns a patent for a surgical stapler. Covidien challenged claims of the patent in an inter partes review (IPR) as being obvious over certain prior art. A three-member PTAB panel decided to institute the IPR, and that same panel later issued a final written decision finding the challenged claims invalid for obviousness. The patent owner appealed, challenging the authority of the same panel to both institute and try the case to a final written decision. On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed that the AIA permits the same

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from