Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2014

Nautilus Making Waves In The Northern District

The Supreme Court took a keen interest in patent cases this term, and the ripple effects are already being felt.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Order Granting Motion to File Supplementing Briefing, Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al., Case No. C 05-cv-4063 (Judge Claudia Wilken)

The Supreme Court took a keen interest in patent cases this term, and the ripple effects are already being felt. The Court changed the standard for patent indefiniteness in its recent opinion in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc. In Nautilus, the Supreme Court appeared to relax the Federal Circuit's strict "insolubly ambiguous" standard for indefiniteness, in holding that a claim was indefinite when it failed to inform, "with reasonable certainty," those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention. Nautilus will likely have a significant impact on pending patent cases as defendants seek to take advantage of the new indefiniteness standard. Judge Wilken's Order in this Tessera case illustrates how a defendant could seek to raise a Nautilus defense in a case that is well underway.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from