Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MAY 2016

Monday Night Football

It is rare for a party to leapfrog a court to seek review at the highest level, but occasionally one goes directly from high school to the big leagues.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Last Monday, Pro-Football, Inc. petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its case (Pro- Football, Inc. v. Blackhorse) before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals rules on it, but only if the Supreme Court grants certiorari in Lee v. Tam. Asking the Supreme Court to take a case before the Circuit Court of Appeals renders its decision is really rare. Almost as rare as my having anything to say about sports. Which should soon be obvious, if you keep reading.

As a reminder, here's the line-up: Pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is Pro-Football's appeal from a district court decision affirming the TTAB's decision to cancel Pro-Football's registrations for various marks that include the term "Redskins" on the ground that such term violates the anti-disparagement clause (Section 2(a)) of the Lanham Act. Pro-Football's case has been fully briefed and the parties had been waiting for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to schedule oral argument.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from