Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MAY 2024

Means-Plus-Function And Step-Plus-Function Claim Limitations (35 U.S.C. 112(f)): Memo To Examiners From The USPTO

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

On March 18, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) sought to improve clarity of the patent prosecution record through providing patent examiners with reminders...

United StatesIntellectual Property

On March 18, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) sought to improve clarity of the patent prosecution record through providing patent examiners with reminders and increased guidance on analyzing means-plus-function and step-plus-functions claims.1 Resources for Examining Means-Plus-Function and Step-Plus-Function Claim Limitations (35 U.S.C. 112(f)) (uspto.gov). In particular, the memo highlights guidance in the M.P.E.P relating to

  • determining whether a claim limitation invokes § 112(f);
  • ensuring that the record is clear with respect to § 112(f); and
  • evaluating the description necessary to support a § 112(f) claim limitation under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from