Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 APRIL 2004

Licensee in Good Standing Barred From Bringing Declaratory Judgment Action

In a case involving a declaratory judgment suit, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a district court’s ruling that the claims at issue were not infringed and invalid on the grounds that the lower court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a case involving a declaratory judgment suit, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a district court’s ruling that the claims at issue were not infringed and invalid on the grounds that the lower court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. The Federal Circuit held that a patent licensee in good standing who continues to pay royalties may not file suit for declaratory judgment to challenge the licensed patents because there is no case in controversy. Gen-Probe Incorporated v. Vysis, Inc., Case Nos. 02-1617,-1618 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 5, 2004) (Rader, J.)

Gen-Probe was a licensee of U.S. Pat. No. 5,750,338 (the `338 patent) owned by Vysis. The patent relates to methods of capturing and amplifying viral DNA in blood samples. At the time the `338 patent issued, Gen-Probe and Vysis were litigating unrelated patents. An employee of Vysis informed an employee of Gen-Probe, orally and in writing, that its products may infringe the `338 patent. In order to resolve all of its

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from