Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 SEPTEMBER 2020

Lego's BRICKHEADZ Applications Run Into TTABrick Wall

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Nothing clicked for Lego in its attempt to register the mark BRICKHEADZ, in standard character and logo form, for "computer game software" and "construction toys; toy construction blocks and connecting links therefor; toy figures."

United StatesIntellectual Property

Nothing clicked for Lego in its attempt to register the mark BRICKHEADZ, in standard character and logo form, for "computer game software" and "construction toys; toy construction blocks and connecting links therefor; toy figures." The Board blocked registration, finding the marks likely to cause confusion with the registered mark BRICKHEADZ (in standard characters), for "education services, namely, providing classes and educational children's parties in the field of construction toys to promote, [sic] creativity, critical thinking, and social development as wells [sic] as lessons from science, technology, engineering, math, language arts and social studies." The Board also upheld a requirement that Lego disclaim BRICK in the logo mark application. In re LEGO Juris A/S, Serial Nos. 87886005 and 87886027 (September 2, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. Cataldo)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from