Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 OCTOBER 2011

Knowledge Is Power: Requiring ‘Knowledge Of The Patent’

The patent law, through sections 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(b) and 271(c), provides a vehicle for patentees to hold indirect patent infringers liable.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Originally published in Law360, September 22, 2011

Law360, New York (September 22, 2011, 1:11 PM ET) -- The patent law, through sections 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(b) and 271(c), provides a vehicle for patentees to hold indirect patent infringers liable. Section 271(b), the focus of this article, addresses induced infringement in very simple terms: "Whoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer." Section 271(c), the contributory infringement counterpart to section 271(b), is more lengthy and includes a knowledge element by its plain terms.1

In interpreting section 271(c), the U.S. Supreme Court held long ago that a contributory infringer must know not only that a component it sold be especially adapted for acts underlying the infringement, but also that the resulting combination for which the component was made was patented.2That is, to be liable, a contributory infringer must, in the first place, know of the patent whose infringement she

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from