Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 DECEMBER 2017

Issue Preclusion And Likelihood Of Confusion

Therefore, it gave preclusive effect to the TTAB decision and dismissed Encore's counterclaim for declaratory judgment of non-infringement.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Less than three years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 1293 (2015), holding that so long as other ordinary elements of issue preclusion are met, when the usages adjudicated by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board are materially the same as those before the district court, issue preclusion should apply.

As a reminder, the elements of issue preclusion are (1) that the issues in both proceedings are identical, (2) the issue in the earlier proceeding was fully litigated and decided, (3) there was a full and fair opportunity for litigation in the prior proceeding, and (4) the issue decided was necessary to support a valid and final judgment on the merits. When all elements are present, the earlier decision of the issue precludes re-litigation of it in the later proceeding.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from