Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 SEPTEMBER 2026

Is Your Website Content Infringing? Fifth Circuit Rebuffs “Server Test” In Online Embedding Case

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

The Fifth Circuit has rejected the Ninth Circuit's "server test" for copyright infringement in embedded content cases, establishing a new "transmit requirement" standard that examines where content originates and whether transmission was authorized. While reaching similar practical outcomes, this transmission-focused approach creates new considerations for publishers and aggregators regarding technical controls, server configurations, and content sourcing practices.

United StatesIntellectual Property

For nearly twenty years, the Ninth Circuit’s “server test” was the only appellate standard for determining whether embedded online content infringes a copyright owner’s public display right. The Fifth Circuit has now weighed in, rejecting the “server test” but reaching substantially the same result. In a copyright case between a news publisher and a news aggregator site, the Fifth Circuit concluded that a website embedding copyrighted content from another site does not directly infringe when it merely directs a user’s browser to retrieve that content transmitted by the copyright owner’s server, which retains the ability to permit or reject the request. (Emmerich Newspapers, Inc. v. Particle Media, Inc., No. 25-60550 (5th Cir. Aug. 27, 2026)). The court boiled it down to this: “connecting does not equate to displaying.”

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from