Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MAY 2011

IP Update, Vol. 14, No. 4, April 2011 (Part 2)

A unanimous U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit revised the two-step test set forth in KMS Fastening Systems for determining when a contempt order is appropriate for an alleged violation of an injunction by a modified product.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Edited by Paul Devinsky and Rita Weeks

Trademarks

No Likelihood of Confusion or Dilution Between CITIBANK and CAPITAL CITY BANK

KINDER Not Confusingly Similar to TiMi KINDERJOGHURT

Copyrights

"Situs of the Injury" for Exercising Personal Jurisdiction over Defendant for Online Copyright Infringement Is Location of Copyright Owner

No Standing if Plaintiff's Exclusive Rights Were Limited in Time

Trade Secrets

Ninth Circuit No Friend to Winklevoss Twins: Facebook Settlement Stands

Software Compilation Not A Trade Secret Under State Law

Trademarks / Likelihood of Confusion Analysis

No Likelihood of Confusion or Dilution Between CITIBANK and CAPITAL CITY BANK

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from