Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MARCH 2016

IP Newsflash - March 18, 2016

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

The Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) determination of unpatentability for claims covering new rules for a card game.

United StatesIntellectual Property

FEDERAL CIRCUIT CASES

"Bust!" — Federal Circuit Deals Tough News to Inventors of Card Game

The Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) determination of unpatentability for claims covering new rules for a card game. The panel found the claims patentineligible under the Mayo twostep analysis for 35 U.S.C. § 101. First, they were directed to an abstract idea; second, they lacked an inventive concept sufficient to bridge the gap between abstract idea and invention.

In applying Mayo, the panel decided to stick with the Board's reasoning that the rules of a wagering game are like the ineligible methods from Alice (reducing risk in escrow settlement) and Bilski (reducing risk in price fluctuations) — wagering is "effectively, a method of exchanging and resolving financial obligations based on probabilities created during the distribution of the [playing] cards." Turning to the next step, the panel reasoned that the additional elements in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from