Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 DECEMBER 2007

Inventor "Raised From The Dead" Not Exceptional

Despite acknowledging "a unique case involving an unusual set of facts—a not-so-dead inventor, forged documents, no evidence of culpability, and a late discovery request," the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s finding that the case is not exceptional.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Despite acknowledging "a unique case involving an unusual set of facts—a not-so-dead inventor, forged documents, no evidence of culpability, and a late discovery request," the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that the case is not exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and does not support a motion for attorneys’ fees. Digeo, Inc. v. Audible, Inc., Case No. 07-1133 (Fed. Cir., Nov. 1, 2007) (Michel, C.J.).

Digeo purchased U.S. Patent No. 5,734,823 (the ’823 patent) "as is" in 2002 at a bankruptcy estate sale. Prior to the sale, Digeo obtained the patent file history, in which a power of attorney (POA) was filed in 1996, allegedly signed by one of four inventors as the executor of the estate of his deceased brother, a second inventor. Also filed on the same day was a separate POA by the remaining three inventors. In assignments executed in 1996, but not recorded until 2002, the three inventors executed an assignment, and the one inventor

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from