Invalidity Contentions Serve as Estoppel Benchmark
A Patent Owner may only avail itself of an IPR estoppel defense
in court upon demonstrating that a competent prior art search would
have uncovered the art that is asserted post-IPR (i.e., raised or
reasonably could have raised during the IPR. 35 U.S.C.
§ 315(e)(2)) This
demonstration of proof can be complicated by a number of
factual questions such as the degree of skill of the searcher, the
complexity of the art, and what was known by the petitioner and
when.
A recent decision in the Southern District of Texas looks to
simplify such disputes by utilizing invalidity contentions as
estoppel markers.
In Neuro Cardiac Technologies, LLC v. Livanova, Inc.,
No. H-18-1517, the court analyzed how to preemptively address
estoppel after a petition for inter partes review has been
filed, but prior to an institution decision being issued. While
granting a stay in the case pending denial or completion of the
inter partes r