Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 DECEMBER 2013

Infringing Circuit Enjoined … A Bit Later

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s findings of non-obviousness based on motivation to combine and objective criteria, and the scope of the injunction that issued, including as sunset period to permit sell off of product.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Broadcom v. Emulex

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's findings of non-obviousness based on motivation to combine and objective criteria, and the scope of the injunction that issued, including as sunset period to permit sell off of product.  Broadcom v. Emulex, Case No. 12-1309 (Fed. Cir., Oct. 7, 2013) (Rader, C. J.).

Broadcom sued Emulex for infringement of its patented circuit device for converting an analog signal to a digital signal.  Emulex appealed the court's judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) of infringement, non-obviousness and its entry of a permanent injunction, that provided Emulex a sell off period to fulfill existing contracts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from