Some respondents at the ITC have taken advantage of using
infringement contentions as a procedural tool to deny patent owners
from getting their day in court. In some investigations,
respondents have gone so far as to delay their own production of
discovery until after the infringement contention deadline, then
claim lack of fair notice when the patent owner uses the late
discovery in its expert report. This gamesmanship, and its
potential repercussions, adds dimensions of procedural complexity
to representing patent owners at the ITC.
ALJ Elliot's recent decision in Certain Touch-Controlled
Mobile Devices (Inv. No. 337-TA-1162) may tip the balance away
from respondents trying to use infringement contentions as a
vehicle to unduly restrict patent owners and more in favor of the
gatekeeper function originally intended. In this case, ALJ Elliot
denied Amazon, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Microsoft, Motorola, and
Samsung's (collectively, "Respondents") motion to
strike portions of