Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 DECEMBER 2014

Independent Corroboration Required To Prove Conception

The PTAB, noting that SurfCast had misapprehended Federal Circuit case law, found that the patent owner had not proven prior conception.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Microsoft Corp. v. SurfCast, Inc.

Addressing the requirements for antedating prior art, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruled all claims of a challenged patent unpatentable, finding that in order to prove prior conception, an inventor's testimony must be independently corroborated.  Microsoft Corp. v. SurfCast, Inc., Case Nos. IPR2013-00292; and -00295 (PTAB, Oct. 14, 2014) (Clements, APJ).

Microsoft filed four petitions requesting inter partes review of a single patent that had claims related to a graphical user interface that organizes content from a variety of information sources into a grid of tiles, each with an independent refresh rate.  SurfCast sought to antedate a prior art reference, a patent that Microsoft relied on as a § 102(e) reference.  As evidence of conception dates, each inventor submitted a declaration.  To corroborate the inventors' testimony, SurfCast submitted physical exhibits in the form of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from