Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 OCTOBER 2019

In "Unusual" Step, Federal Circuit Reverses PTAB Factual Finding On Proper Primary Reference

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The Federal Circuit took what it called an "unusual" step in Campbell Soup Co. v. Gamon Plus, Inc., Nos. 2018-2029, 2018-2030 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 26, 2019)

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Federal Circuit took what it called an “unusual” step in Campbell Soup Co. v. Gamon Plus, Inc., Nos. 2018-2029, 2018-2030 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 26, 2019) by reversing the Board’s determination that a reference was not a proper primary reference. 

In this design patent IPR litigation regarding cylindrical object dispensers, the Board found that two proposed references were not proper primary references because each failed the “basically the same” test.  The Board found that the first reference required substantial modifications, like adding a cylindrical object, to appear visually similar to the challenged design.  The second reference failed because making that design “basically the same” as the challenged design would require changing its dimensions and removing parts.  In both cases, the Board emphasized that the visual appearance of proper primary references cannot be modified using hindsight.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from