The Federal Circuit took what it called an “unusual”
step in Campbell Soup Co. v. Gamon Plus,
Inc., Nos. 2018-2029, 2018-2030 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 26, 2019)
by reversing the Board’s determination that a reference was
not a proper primary reference.
In this design patent IPR litigation regarding cylindrical
object dispensers, the Board found that two proposed references
were not proper primary references because each failed the
“basically the same” test. The Board found that
the first reference required substantial modifications, like adding
a cylindrical object, to appear visually similar to the challenged
design. The second reference failed because making that
design “basically the same” as the challenged design
would require changing its dimensions and removing parts. In
both cases, the Board emphasized that the visual appearance of
proper primary references cannot be modified using hindsight.