Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MARCH 2023

In Parallel Proceedings, Compelling Merits Matter Last In Fintiv Analysis

Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Contributor
Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring’s Doha office is a full service legal practice that serves as the firm’s regional...

View firm profile
Explore more from Crowell & Moring LLP

On February 27, 2023, the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") issued a precedential sua sponte Director Review Decision in the Inter Partes Review...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Key Takeaways

  • An AIA proceeding with a parallel district court litigation will be subject to a multi-step Fintiv discretionary denial analysis.
  • The PTAB will first conduct an analysis of Fintiv factors 1-5, and then will only consider compelling merits factor 6 when that initial analysis favors denial.

On February 27, 2023, the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") issued a precedential sua sponte Director Review Decision in the Inter Partes Review ("IPR") of Commscope Technologies LLC v. Dali Wireless, Inc. ("Commscope"), IPR2022-01242. The decision vacated the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") decision granting institution of the petition and held that when deciding whether to institute an America Invents Act ("AIA") post-grant proceeding1 with a parallel district court litigation, the PTAB must first conduct Fintiv2 discretionary denial analysis. The PTAB should only consider the compelling merits (or

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from