Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 APRIL 2018

Important New Patent Term Adjustment Decision Allowing Post-RCE B Delay

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

The ARIAD case addressed whether the period of time consumed by continued examination necessarily begins on the day an RCE is filed, as the PTO argued.

United StatesIntellectual Property

A recent decision calls into question the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) regulation providing that B delay stops accruing as soon as a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) is filed. In March 2018, the PTO declined to appeal a district court decision rejecting the PTO's application of the provision excluding "time consumed by continued examination" from "B delay" under the patent term adjustment (PTA) statute. See ARIAD Pharms. Inc. v. Matal, No. 1:17–cv–733, 2018 WL 339141 (Jan. 5, 2018). Although the circumstances of the ARIAD case were unusual, the implications of the decision could be broader, potentially entitling patentees to additional days of PTA for most applications involving continued examination.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from