Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 DECEMBER 2010

Important New Patent Decision on Successor Liability

In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit held that a U.S. subsidiary of Daewoo Electronics was the successor-in-interest to a now-defunct U.S. subsidiary whose business it continued.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit held that a U.S. subsidiary of Daewoo Electronics was the successor-in-interest to a now-defunct U.S. subsidiary whose business it continued. Funai Electric Co., Ltd. v. Daewoo Electronics Corp. et al., Nos. 2009-1225, 2009-1244. The Federal Circuit applied state successor liability law, notwithstanding the fact that the business was transferred as part of an agreement executed solely between parent companies in South Korea, the law of which does not recognize successor liability that is not expressly assumed by contract. As successor-in-interest, the present Daewoo subsidiary was held liable for an $8 million default judgment against the predecessor, in addition to damages for infringing sales it made after the transfer of the business.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from