Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MARCH 2022

Four Pitfalls To Avoid When Seeking To Terminate A Section 337 Investigation By Consent Order

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

A survey of decisions at the International Trade Commission ("ITC") reveals several pitfalls practitioners should seek to avoid when drafting consent orders and stipulations to terminate a Section 337 investigation.

United StatesIntellectual Property

A survey of decisions at the International Trade Commission ("ITC") reveals several pitfalls practitioners should seek to avoid when drafting consent orders and stipulations to terminate a Section 337 investigation. In general, parties should take great care in preparing motions for termination based on consent orders. This is an area where even slight deviations from the numerous requirements of the ITC's Rules regarding the contents of the motion, the stipulation, and the proposed consent order often result in rejection by the ALJ or the Commission, requiring re-drafting and re-execution of the necessary papers to effect termination even when there is no opposition to the motion by the litigants.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from