Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MAY 2016

For SPLA Audits, When Historical Data Is Missing, Creativity May Be Required

Most companies licensing software under SPLA simply do not keep records regarding their usage quantities for past months.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Most software audits pertaining to products licensed under perpetual licenses (such as licenses acquired under a Microsoft Select Agreement, MPSA or (usually) Enterprise Agreement) incorporate a snapshot-in-time approach, where licenses owned generally are compared to deployments identified through data collected about current-state product deployments. In contrast, audits pertaining to products licensed under a Microsoft Services Provider License Agreement (SPLA) incorporate a strong historical-use element. Since SPLA pricing is based on a monthly reporting model, SPLA audits look at historical usage during the period covered by an audit (often, three years or more), and then compare that historical usage to a licensees' historical usage reports.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from