Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 FEBRUARY 2015

Federal Circuit Upholds PTO Refusal To Withdraw Unauthorized Terminal Disclaimer

Always get authority directly from the client before filing anything that fundamentally affects a client's rights.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Japanese Found. for Cancer Research v. Lee

Addressing for the first time the issue of whether a terminal disclaimer filed without the client's actual authority can be withdrawn, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's ruling that the Patent and Trademark Office had acted arbitrarily and capriciously in refusing to withdraw a terminal disclaimer.  Japanese Found. for Cancer Research v. Lee, Case Nos. 13-1678, 14-1014 (Fed. Cir., Dec. 9, 2014) (Prost, C.J.).

Counsel for the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (the Foundation) filed a terminal disclaimer, stemming from a miscommunication between a Japanese licensee, the licensee's Japanese patent counsel and the Foundation's attorney of record, a U.S. law firm. The licensee's in-house counsel had earlier contacted a paralegal who worked with their Japanese patent counsel to inquire as to whether a patent may be disclaimed before it lapsed because of non-payment of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from