Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 OCTOBER 2017

Federal Circuit Schools USPTO On Broadest Reasonable Claim Construction

In recent decisions, the Federal Circuit has found error in the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board's approach to obviousness rejections, including its reliance on the doctrine of routine optimization...

United StatesIntellectual Property

In recent decisions, the Federal Circuit has found error in the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board's approach to obviousness rejections, including its reliance on the doctrine of routine optimization without evidence of an expectation of success, and its reliance on the doctrine of inherency when the record reveals unexpected results. Now, the Federal Circuit has criticized the Board's approach to claim construction, finding in In re Smith International, Inc.  that the Board applied an unreasonably broad construction that was not consistent with the applicant's use of the term in the specification.

The Patent At Issue

The patent at issue was U.S. Patent 6,732,817, which had been rejected in an ex parte reexamination proceeding. The invention relates to tools used for drilling. Claim 28 is representative:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from