Emphasizing that “the appealed claims represent a
non-abstract improvement in the functionality of an existing
technological process and not simply an abstract idea of
manipulating data” or “a mere desired result,”
for which computers are invoked merely as a tool, the Federal
Circuit reversed the district court in Koninklijke KPN N.V. v.
Gemalto M2M GmbH and held that the claims met the requirements
of 35 U.S.C. § 101. This case adds to the rapidly growing body
of Federal Circuit clarifications on the application of Section 101
to software related patents.
In the underlying district court litigation, Koninklijke KPN
(KPN) asserted U.S. Patent No. 6,212,662 (“the ’622
Patent”) against several defendants (“the
Appellees”). The ’622 Patent covers an improvement to
error detection systems used in data transmission. In the prior
art, these systems would detect transmission errors by having the
transmitting side of the system compute “check data”
based on the underlying