Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2020

Federal Circuit Reverses Section 101 Ineligibility Determination Of Error Correction Algorithm Patent

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

Emphasizing that "the appealed claims represent a non-abstract improvement in the functionality of an existing technological process and not simply an abstract idea of manipulating data

United StatesIntellectual Property

Emphasizing that “the appealed claims represent a non-abstract improvement in the functionality of an existing technological process and not simply an abstract idea of manipulating data” or “a mere desired result,” for which computers are invoked merely as a tool, the Federal Circuit reversed the district court in Koninklijke KPN N.V. v. Gemalto M2M GmbH and held that the claims met the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 101. This case adds to the rapidly growing body of Federal Circuit clarifications on the application of Section 101 to software related patents.

In the underlying district court litigation, Koninklijke KPN (KPN) asserted U.S. Patent No. 6,212,662 (“the ’622 Patent”) against several defendants (“the Appellees”). The ’622 Patent covers an improvement to error detection systems used in data transmission. In the prior art, these systems would detect transmission errors by having the transmitting side of the system compute “check data” based on the underlying

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from