Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 SEPTEMBER 2013

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - September 2013

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Plager, J. Reversing safe harbor ruling and finding claims invalid due to double patenting.

United StatesIntellectual Property
WilmerHale'S Intellectual Property Practice Group
WilmerHale'S Intellectual Property Practice Group
Author LinkedIn connections

St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Access Closure, Inc.  (2012-1452, 9/11/13) (Lourie, Plager, Wallach)

September 11, 2013 11:47 AM

Plager, J. Reversing safe harbor ruling and finding claims invalid due to double patenting. The § 121 safe harbor did not apply because consonance was not maintained and the asserted patent was directed to the same invention as an earlier issued, related, patent. Also affirming ruling that other patents, related to sealing a vascular puncture, were not obvious. Lourie, J. concurred.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

High Point Design LLC v. Buyer's Direct, Inc. (2012-1455, 9/11/13) (O'Malley, Schall, Wallach)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from