Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 OCTOBER 2018

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - October 2018

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Prost, C.J. Affirming a PTAB inter partes reexamination decision rejecting patent claims as anticipated or obvious over the cited prior art, including a parent of the reexamined patent.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Precedential Opinions

1. NATURAL ALTERNATIVES v. IANCU [OPINION] (2017-1962, 10/01/2018) (PROST, MOORE, and REYNA)

Prost, C.J. Affirming a PTAB inter partes reexamination decision rejecting patent claims as anticipated or obvious over the cited prior art, including a parent of the reexamined patent. The only issue on appeal was whether the reexamined patent was entitled to the priority date of one of the applicant's earlier applications. The Court held that the reexamined patent was not entitled to the earlier priority date because during prosecution the applicant had deleted its claim to the priority date of the earlier application.

2. WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH v. APPLE INC. [OPINION] (2017-2265, 2017-2380, 09/28/2018) (PROST, BRYSON, and O'MALLEY)*

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from