Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 MARCH 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - March 2017

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Moore, J. Reversing decision that claims related to an inertial tracking system were invalid under § 101 and remanding. "That a mathematical equation is required to complete the claimed method...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Thales Visionix Inc. v. US (No. 2015-5150, 3/8/17) (Moore, Wallach, Stoll)

March 8, 2017 10:40 AM

Moore, J. Reversing decision that claims related to an inertial tracking system were invalid under § 101 and remanding. "That a mathematical equation is required to complete the claimed method and system does not doom the claims to abstraction... The claims specify a particular configuration of inertial sensors and a particular method of using the raw data from the sensors in order to more accurately calculate the position and orientation of an object on a moving platform. The mathematical equations are a consequence of the arrangement of the sensors and the unconventional choice of reference frame in order to calculate position and orientation. Far from claiming the equations themselves, the claims seek to protect only the application of physics to the unconventional configuration of sensors as disclosed. As such, these claims are not directed to an abstract idea and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from