Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 DECEMBER 2018

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - December 2018

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

O'Malley, J. Affirming Board decision in IPR of obviousness.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Spineology, Inc. v. Wright Medical Technology Inc. (No. 2018-1276, 12/14/18) (Prost, Dyk, Moore)

Moore, J. Affirming denial of motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. "[W]e caution future litigants to tread carefully in their complaints about district courts not doing enough." The Court also stated that a "district court need not, as [defendant] seems to urge, litigate to resolution every issue mooted by summary judgment to rule on a motion for attorney fees. And we need not, as [defendant] requests, get into the weeds on issues the district court never reached."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Virntex Inc. v. Apple, Inc.  (No. 2017-2490, 12/10/18) (Newman, O'Malley, Chen)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from