Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MAY 2018

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - April 2018

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - April 2018

United StatesIntellectual Property

View previous updates...

01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Citrix Online, LLC (No. 2017-1869, 4/26/18) (Newman, Mayer, Stoll)

April 26, 2018 11:07 AM

Mayer J. Affirming plaintiff's motion for a new trial motion. The defendant did not improperly assert a "practicing the prior art" defense. While a defendant "cannot defeat a claim of literal infringement or establish invalidity merely by pointing to similarities between an accused product and the prior art," this rule does not "preclude a litigant from arguing that if a claim term must be broadly interpreted to read on an accused device, then this same broad construction will read on the prior art."

WilmerHale represented the defendants-appellees.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from