Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 DECEMBER 2018

Federal Circuit Patent Update - December 2018

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Dyk, J. Manufacturer lacked personal jurisdiction over patentee to sustain declaratory judgment in Tennessee.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Precedential Federal Circuit Opinions

MAXCHIEF INVESTMENTS LIMITED v. WOK & PAN, IND., INC. [OPINION - PRECEDENTIAL]  (Dyke, Reyna and Hughes)

Dyk, J. Manufacturer lacked personal jurisdiction over patentee to sustain declaratory judgment in Tennessee. Fact that patentee sought an injunction in a separate California action which might have effect on behavior of non-party Tennessee distributor was too attenuated to satisfy minimum contacts. Personal jurisdiction was also lacking over tortious interference claim. Sending a letter to an entity in the forum state might be sufficient to create personal jurisdiction over a tortious interference claim. However, here, the receiving entity was not located in Tennessee even if its lawyer was.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from