Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 APRIL 2019

Federal Circuit Patent Update - April 15, 2019

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Newman, J. Reversing PTAB and finding that patentee had antedated references where PTAB erred in its application of the law of diligence.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Precedential Federal Circuit Opinions

  1. ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC v. IANCU [OPINION - PRECEDENTIAL] (2016-2222, 2016-2406, 2016-2608, 4/11/2019) (Newman, O'Malley, Wallach)

    Newman, J. Reversing PTAB and finding that patentee had antedated references where PTAB erred in its application of the law of diligence.
  2. OMEGA PATENTS, LLC v. CALAMP CORP. [OPINION - PRECEDENTIAL] (2018-1309, 4/8/2019) (Prost, Dyk, Wallach)

    Dyk, J. After jury trial, affirming-in-part, reversing-in-part and remanding action involving patents relating to multivehicle compatible control systems. The defendant failed to preserve a claim construction argument that it argued would have allowed it to introduce additional prior art where it never identified the prior art at Markman or thereafter. With respect to direct infringement of one patent, the Court remanded based on the district court's failure to instruct the jury on the meaning of one claim term, although there was no disagreement on the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from