Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JANUARY 2014

Federal Circuit Modifies The Method For Calculating B-Delay In Patent Term Adjustment

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued on Jan. 15, 2014, its decision modifying the method for calculating Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) for an application that included a Request for Continued Examination (RCE).

United StatesIntellectual Property

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued on Jan. 15, 2014, its decision modifying the method for calculating Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) for an application that included a Request for Continued Examination (RCE). In the case Novartis AG v. Lee, No. 2013-1160, -1179 (Fed. Cir. 2014), the CAFC determined that the amount of "B-delay" includes post-allowance time, i.e., the time between allowance and issuance, for an application whose prosecution includes a RCE filing.

In construing 35 U.S.C. § 154(b)(1)(B), the court explained that B-delay occurs if the issue of a patent is "delayed due to the failure of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to issue a patent within 3 years after the actual filing date of the application in the United States." Further, the amount of B-delay, however, does not include "any time consumed by the continued examination of application requested by the applicant under section 132(b)." And,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from